The largest federal budget deficit since World War II came back in 2009, as slower growth and increased government spending during the subprime-mortgage financial panic pushed the deficit to 9.8% of GDP. This year’s the budget deficit will, quite simply, blow that record out of the water. The Congressional Budget Office recently totaled up all the legislative measures taken so far – as well as the effects of a weaker economy (payments for unemployment benefits would be going up even with the recent law) – and they estimated this year’s budget deficit at $3.7 trillion, which they forecast would represent about 18% of GDP.
As if that weren’t enough, the House of Representatives just passed a bill that would add another $3 trillion to the debt. Although a detailed year-by-year cost estimate isn’t yet available on the spending provisions, and the bill is dead-on-arrival in the Senate, which isn’t going to rubber stamp that proposal, it’s likely Congress and President Trump will end up compromising on some sort of additional measures that drive the deficit even higher. As a result, we’re guessing the budget gap for the current fiscal year ends up closer to $4 trillion, or about 20% of GDP, the highest since 1943-45. Given the economic crater generated by the Coronavirus and related shutdowns, as well as the heavy-handed legislative response, budget deficits will be enormous in the years ahead, too.
In spite of these sky-high numbers, it’s important to recognize that the US government is not about to go bankrupt. The debt, while large (and growing), remains manageable. Before the present crisis, the average interest rate on all outstanding Treasury debt, including the securities issued multiple decades ago, was 2.4%. Now, our calculations suggest newly issued debt is going for about 0.25%, on average, which applies to both the recent increase in debt as well as portions of pre-existing debt coming due and getting rolled over at lower interest rates.
When debt that costs 2.4% gets rolled over at around 0.25%, that’s a great deal for future US taxpayers. The problem is, the Treasury Department has been decidedly stubborn about not issuing longer-dated securities – think 50 and 100-year bonds – that would allow taxpayers to lock-in these low interest rates for longer, making it easier to spread out the cost of the extra debt incurred throughout the crisis. As a result, if (or more like when) interest rates go back up, the interest burden generated by the national debt could go up substantially.
The best move the Treasury Department could make would be to use the recent surge in debt to overhaul the kinds of securities it issues. One idea that deserves exploring is replacing all securities with a maturity of over, say, 2 years, with “perpetual” or “interest-only debt.” No principal would ever have to be paid on these instruments; they’d just pay the same nominal amount of interest twice per year. If we want to mix it up a bit, some debt could pay interest with gradual adjustments for inflation, just like TIPS.
This is not a new idea. The British issued perpetual bonds starting in the 1750s, and the last ones were retired in 2015. And although they’re called “perpetual” bonds, and they’re not callable, the Treasury Department could always buy them back at market prices to retire them.
Liquidity should not be an issue. Every time the government needs to issue longer-dated securities, it could simply re-open that very same security. Then the private sector could slice and dice them, on demand. If someone needs a 10-year zero-coupon Treasury note, just take the interest payment due in ten years and package that into a stand-alone security. Want something like a traditional 30-year? An investment firm can package a stream of interest payments over the next 30 years and tie it to a big package of payments due in exactly thirty years.
But it’s not only the debt generated by recent fiscal measures that will burden future generations. Overly generous unemployment benefits are disincentivizing many unemployed workers from re-joining the labor force, which slows the process of accumulating skills. Widespread government-mandated closures also hinder skill-formation, as well as risk destroying some (or all) of the know-how embedded in business’s operations.
Yes, the debt is a burden on future taxpayers. In this way, the fiscal response magnifies the effects of other responses to the Coronavirus. So far, the age of the typical person who has died with the virus has been about 80 years old. Right or wrong, our government – and society in general – has taken enormous measures to contain the virus to save the lives of our elderly population, and these moves have imposed enormous costs disproportionately borne by the younger generations who are out of jobs, school, and business opportunities. The very same group who will be paying the costs well into the future.
Source: First Trust Economics Blog – How Are We Going to Pay For All of This? Brian Wesbury & Robert Stein
This report was prepared by First Trust Advisors L.P., and reflects the current opinion of the authors. It is based upon sources and data believed to be accurate and reliable. Opinions and forward looking statements expressed are subject to change without notice. This information does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any security. First Trust Advisors L.P. is not affiliated with Cetera Advisor Networks LLC or CWM, LLC
What is Going on With Earnings?
Nearly half of S&P 500 companies have reported 1Q20 earnings, and our current estimate is for a -20% decline relative to a year prior. Against this backdrop, however, equity markets have continued trending higher. At the end of the day, the stock market seems to be focused on three things: slower growth in the number of cases of COVID-19, the massive amount of fiscal and monetary stimulus that has been announced in recent weeks and the expectation of a v-shaped recovery in the economy and corporate profits. From our vantage point, the first two drivers of the market rally are fact, but the third seems to be fiction; while we anticipate a recovery into the end of 2020 and beginning of 2021, we do not think it will be as robust as consensus expects.
As such, we remain intensely focused on what is happening with corporate profits, as over the long-run, earnings are the main driver of equity returns. Corporate managements continue to pull 2020 guidance, but some of the trends that have emerged during the first quarter earnings season, thus far, can be helpful in building expectations for how things may evolve during the rest of the year. In general, this earnings season has been about the good, the bad and the ugly.
• The good: the health care sector has seen solid demand for over-the-counter pharmaceuticals and branded drugs, although medical device sales have been disappointing. In consumer staples, strength has been concentrated in food products that are consumed at home, as well as household items; perhaps unsurprisingly, food that is consumed away from home has been a headwind, as has a stronger U.S. dollar. Finally, technology and communications services companies are seeing strength in hardware, software and content that can be consumed at home, but advertising revenue is down.
• The bad: financial service company earnings have been weak, as rising loan loss provisions have offset solid capital markets activity. The big question going forward will be whether an uptick in loan volumes is able to offset lower net interest income. In the materials space, a decline in transportation and travel has led to a softening in demand for many products.
• The ugly: industrials and energy are in bad shape, with the industrial sector struggling due to the impact of stay at home orders on the airlines, as well as an overall decline in shipping activity. Meanwhile, lower oil prices are impacting energy sector revenues, and forcing companies to take impairment charges on their oil field assets.
Source: JP Morgan Market Insights May 1, 2020 – What is Going on With Earnings? by David Lebovitz
This information was written by J.P. Morgan, a non-affiliate of Cetera Advisor Networks LLC or CWM, LLC
Investors cannot invest directly in indexes. The performance of any index is not indicative of the performance of any investment and does not take into account the effects of inflation and the fees and expenses associated with investing.
The S&P 500 is a capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries.
Did You Know:
HELP FOR BORROWERS
– Pandemic-impacted homeowners who have mortgages that are owned by Fannie Mae have access to a “forbearance plan” that allows them to reduce or suspend their monthly mortgage payment for up to 12 months. Homeowners are allowed to establish a repayment plan to catch up gradually or modify the entire loan but are not required to make a lump-sum payment at the end of 12 months. Homeowners need to contact their mortgage servicer to determine if they qualify (source: Fannie Mae).
– The US economy fell 4.8% in the first quarter, i.e., quarter-over-quarter change expressed as an annualized total. 47% of the 4.8% decline was from the nation’s “health care” sector, partially due to the requirement that hospitals temporarily stop all non-emergency surgeries (source: Commerce Department).
“Don’t stop because you’re tired; keep going because you’re almost there.” -Ritu Ghatourey
“There is no exercise better for the heart than reaching down and lifting people up.” ― John Holmes
The views stated in this piece are not necessarily the opinion of Cetera Advisor Networks LLC or CWM, LLC and should not be construed directly or indirectly as an offer to buy or sell any securities. Due to volatility within the markets mentioned, opinions are subject to change without notice. Information is based on sources believed to be reliable; however, their accuracy or completeness cannot be guaranteed. Past performance does not guarantee future results.